Chandril Sood vs Vladimir Polyakov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L L L W L
Form
W W W L W L W L L LH2H: Sood 1 - 0 Polyakov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sood winning 2 and Polyakov winning 1. The last match between Sood and Polyakov was at the Pakistan F3 (Islamabad), 17-12-2018, First, Clay with Chandril Sood getting the victory 0-6 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chandril Sood | 1 |
| Vladimir Polyakov | 0 |
Pakistan F3 (Islamabad)(17-12-2018)
0
6
6
2
7
5
| Sood | Stats | Polyakov |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | 791 | |
| 34 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 41% (92-132) | Career Total W/L | 47% (112-126) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,715 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Chandril Sood
Player
Vladimir Polyakov
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 13 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:0:0 | Average Match Time | 2:0:0 |
| 63% (47/75) | 1st Serve % | 67% (57/85) |
| 55% (26/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (30/57) |
| 39% (11/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 58% (7/12) |
| 53% (45/85) | Return Points Win % | 51% (38/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chandril Sood Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Chandril Sood
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
72)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ishaque Eqbal
Player
Chandril Sood
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yash Chaurasia
Player
Chandril Sood
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Vladimir Polyakov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chandril Sood
Player
Vladimir Polyakov
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
0-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saida'Lo Saidkarimov
Player
Vladimir Polyakov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tobias Simon
Player
Vladimir Polyakov
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vladimir Polyakov
Player
S Mert Ozdemir
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Vladimir Polyakov
41%
(
22 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
48
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Polyakov
Player
Alexey Baryshev
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41% (92/132) | Win/Loss | 47% (112/126) |
| 43% (216/284) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (259/271) |
| 48% (2128/2330) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2374/2372) |
| 40% (64/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (36/41) |
| 46% (28/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (45/51) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (31/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 172 | Aces Total | 129 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 334 | Total Double Faults | 322 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 380.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 493.18 |
| 55% (2443/4464) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3130/5328) |
| 64% (1556/2443) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1932/3130) |
| 44% (895/2021) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1016/2198) |
| 42% (198/466) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (222/557) |
| 40% (1804/4559) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2132/5394) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (9/11) | Challenger W/L | 15% (2/11) |
| 41% (83/120) | Futures W/L | 50% (109/110) |
| 40% (89/221) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (110/227) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 43% (13/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (30/57) |
| 36% (19/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (27/62) |
| 83% (103/85) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (115/95) |
| 17% (103/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (115/19) |
| 6% (121/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (122/17) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
